Dating Again After Divorce

Patterns

Am I repeating my marriage's pursue-and-withdraw pattern by text?

Possibly, and noticing it is most of the work. After a marriage, the old push and pull can move onto a phone screen with a new person, but it is a dance two people do, not proof that you, or they, are your ex.

Possibly, and the fact that you are asking is a good sign. If you notice yourself sending more and more when replies slow down, or going quiet the moment a conversation starts to feel heavy, the pattern from your marriage may be running again on a new screen. That does not mean the new relationship is doomed, or that the new person is your ex.

What did the pattern look like in the marriage?

Most divorced people can describe it in a sentence. One of you brought things up. The other went to the garage, the gym or the phone. The more one pressed, the more the other pulled away, and the more the other pulled away, the harder the first one pressed.

Researchers call this demand and withdraw, and it is one of the best studied patterns in couples research. A 2014 meta-analysis pooled 74 studies with about 14,000 participants and found it linked to lower relationship satisfaction, less intimacy and poorer communication.1

It is worth saying plainly: a pattern like this is two people’s moves, not one person’s fault. Whoever pursued was usually trying to get close. Whoever withdrew was usually trying to keep things from getting worse. Both moves make sense from the inside. Together, they lock.

How does it show up by text?

Take Dana, 47, two years out of a 19-year marriage. In the marriage, she was the one who raised things. Now she is seeing Marcus. On a Saturday he goes quiet after a slightly tense exchange about plans. By Sunday morning she has sent four messages: a joke, a question, a “Did I upset you?”, and a “Fine, whatever.” He replies at noon with one line. She reads it as distance. He reads her four messages as a storm he would rather wait out.

Researchers often describe attachment as two sliding dials. One is anxiety, a worry about being let go. The other is avoidance, discomfort with closeness or depending on someone. In a study of 175 couples aged 18 to 72, avoidance was more strongly tied to a person’s own withdrawing than to demanding, and the combination of one partner withdrawing while the other demanded was linked to lower satisfaction for both of them.2

Texting gives that loop a fast track. In a 2022 study of 302 partnered college students, people higher in anxiety wanted more messages than they got and replied faster than their partners, while people higher in avoidance wanted fewer messages, sent fewer and replied more slowly.3 Put those two habits on one thread and every gap becomes a signal to one person and every follow-up becomes pressure to the other.

Is it the same pattern, or a different person?

Here is the hopeful part. Even inside marriages, demand and withdraw is not a simple countdown. In a longitudinal study of 46 married couples, the pattern was tied to lower satisfaction to some degree, but it also predicted increases in wives’ satisfaction over time, and the researcher concluded that how couples go about it may matter as much as whether they do it.4

So a familiar feeling is not the same as a familiar outcome. Before you decide the old film is playing again, check the ordinary explanations. Marcus may have a Saturday shift, a teenager who needed driving, or a habit of not looking at his phone on weekends. He may simply be someone who prefers to talk in person. Different families, cultures and generations have very different texting norms.

Which side were you on, and has it switched?

Many people assume they will play the same role forever. Often they do not. Someone who withdrew in the marriage may find themselves pursuing now, because the stakes of starting over feel high. Someone who pursued for twenty years may find they are tired of chasing and go cold at the first sign of distance. Where you sit on the two dials can shift with the person and with what you have been through.

That is useful to know, because it means the pattern is not who you are. It is a set of moves you learned, and moves can be changed.

How do you interrupt it by text?

You only control your half, and that is enough to change the rhythm.

If you tend to pursue:

  • Send one message, then wait. Do something else for an hour.
  • Name the need instead of chasing an answer: “I feel better when I know we’re okay after a tense chat. Can we talk tonight?”
  • Read one slow reply as one slow reply, not a ruling.

If you tend to withdraw:

  • Say you need time, and say when you will be back: “I need tonight to think. Can we talk tomorrow at 7?”
  • A short honest message beats a long silence.

Either way:

  • Move anything emotionally loaded to a call or a face-to-face conversation.
  • Agree a rough rhythm early, while things are calm.

What did the marriage actually teach you?

Not that your ex was the problem, and not that you were. It taught you what the loop feels like from the inside: the rising heat when a reply is late, or the urge to shut the door when a message feels like a demand. That knowledge is an advantage now. You can recognize the first step of the dance before you take it.

If the old feelings are intense or are getting in the way of daily life, a licensed therapist can help you work through what the marriage left behind.

What the research doesn’t tell us

Most demand and withdraw studies looked at married or long-term couples talking face to face, not new partners texting. The texting study used college students. None of this can tell you what a specific person means by a specific silence.

What to do this week

  • Write down your move. When a reply is slow, what do you do in the first hour?
  • Count before you send. If you have sent two unanswered messages, stop at two.
  • Say the need once, plainly, in person or on a call.
  • Check the ordinary explanations before the old story.
  • Notice when the new person does something your ex never did. Write that down too.

Try it

Old loop or new information? Sort each thought that shows up while you wait for a reply

  1. 1/7 She hasn't replied since Saturday lunch.

    What happened. That is the observable part. It says nothing yet about why.

  2. 2/7 This is exactly how it started with my ex.

    The old loop talking. That is memory filling in a blank. Your ex is not on the other end of this thread.

  3. 3/7 I've sent three messages since he last wrote.

    What happened. A fact, and a useful one. It is about your side of the dance, which is the side you can change.

  4. 4/7 If I don't push now, it will just die quietly.

    The old loop talking. That is the pursuing move dressed up as a prediction. Pushing harder is what the loop asks for.

  5. 5/7 She said she needed a night to think before we talk about it.

    What happened. She told you what she needs and when. That is information, and it is a good sign.

  6. 6/7 Going quiet is the only way to stop this turning into a fight.

    The old loop talking. That is the withdrawing move talking. Quiet without a word of explanation usually feeds the loop.

  7. 7/7 We've had the same text standoff twice this month.

    What happened. A repeat is real evidence of a pattern between you, which makes it worth one calm conversation.

0 to 2 right

The old loop is doing most of the reading

Right now your marriage's script is narrating this new relationship. That is not a flaw. It is what years of practice does. Slow down and write the plain facts on one side and the story on the other before you send anything.

3 to 5 right

You can see the loop, some of the time

You can already tell some facts from the old story, and the ones that slip past are probably the ones that sting most. Those are the moments to pause, not to type.

6 to 7 right

You can spot the old dance from the outside

You can see the pattern as a pattern. The harder part is acting differently in the moment, when the phone is quiet and the old move feels urgent.

This is one moment. BUMIS is for the text decision keeping you up at night.See your pattern

People who talk about this

Labeled by where their authority comes from. Not a ranking, not an endorsement.

  • Credentialed source

Eli J. Finkel

Research on how modern marriage and long term relationships work, and what partners expect from each other.

Professor of Psychology and of Management and Organizations, Northwestern University; director of the Relationships and Motivation Lab · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source
  • Trending voice

Julie Menanno

How couples get stuck in conflict cycles and how to feel secure with a partner.

Licensed marriage and family therapist (MA, LMFT, LCPC); author of Secure Love · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Lori Gottlieb

What happens in the therapy room, including breakups, dating choices and the stories people tell about love.

Psychotherapist; author of Maybe You Should Talk to Someone and The Atlantic's Dear Therapist column · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Pepper Schwartz

Research and writing on love, sex and relationships, including dating and partnership later in life.

Sociologist (PhD, Yale); Professor Emerita of Sociology, University of Washington · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

All 8 people we point to →

Further reading

From other publishers we trust. The full list

Sources

  1. A Meta-Analytical Review of the Demand/Withdraw Pattern of Interaction (news release)ScienceDaily (reporting Schrodt and colleagues, Communication Monographs, 2014), 2014-08Used for: A meta-analysis led by Paul Schrodt of Texas Christian University pooled 74 studies with about 14,000 participants. The demand-withdraw pattern, in which one partner pressures with requests, criticism or complaints and the other responds with avoidance or silence, was linked to lower relationship satisfaction, less intimacy and poorer communication.
  2. Avoidant Attachment, Withdrawal-Aggression Conflict Pattern, and Relationship Satisfaction: A Mediational Dyadic ModelFrontiers in Psychology, 2022-01Used for: In 175 heterosexual couples aged 18 to 72, attachment avoidance was more strongly associated with a person's own withdrawal than with demanding. The combination of one partner withdrawing and the other demanding was associated with lower relationship satisfaction for both partners.
  3. Adult Romantic Attachment, Electronic Messaging, and Relationship QualityPeer-reviewed study indexed in PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine), 2022Used for: In 302 romantically partnered undergraduates, people higher in attachment anxiety wanted more messages than they received and replied faster than their partners did. People higher in attachment avoidance wanted fewer messages than they received, sent fewer, and replied more slowly than their partners.
  4. The demand/withdraw pattern of communication as a predictor of marital satisfaction over timeHuman Communication Research (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign), 2002Used for: In a longitudinal study of 46 married couples, Caughlin found the link between demand/withdraw and dissatisfaction endured to some extent, but demand/withdraw also predicted increases in wives' satisfaction, suggesting the pattern's effects are more complex than assumed and may depend on how it is enacted.
Up nextWhat does secure texting look like after a divorce?